Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Black-water Blues

Seeing that Kellogg’s, Weight Watchers and all the fancy sports clubs in Manhattan opened the year with declaring war on national obesity under the slogan “diet or die,” Starbucks joined in with a relevant “Skinny Latte” campaign too. I used to be a happy coffee drinker totally oblivious of such irrelevant facts as calorie contents - until now. Thank you, so much! I will add this one to my “Reasons Why I Hate the Starbucks phenomenon” list.
Then, I opened the Business pages of the New York Times today (after my four day boycott due to their public endorsement of the “appropriate” presidential candidates) and I found this heartbreaking story of Starbucks store closings. I got so excited after reading that they might potentially get rid of a hundred (!) under performing stores across the US that I almost skipped the main chart at the left bottom of the article. I was thinking, well finally 2008 may well be a lean year for dedicated weight fighters and the Coffee Predator too. Hahaa!
And then came the chart-shock which put the drama of the day into statistical context turning it into a tragicomedy. The coffee behemoth owns 15,000 stores around the world so closing a hundred is clearly a minute storm in the coffee cup. As the company realized that US coffee addicts suffer from Starbucks-fatigue, in 2008 it decided to focus on Starbucks-rookie overseas markets. (Yes, they will make coffee history in Hungary too this year, which will officially conclude our post-communist reintegration to the civilized world. It was high time.)
Nevertheless, the age of fatigue of some sort finally arrived at least to the US. Starbucks representatives said that the main reason behind the closings is the company’s recognition of the “cannibalization”, “over-saturation” and “commoditization” of the “Starbucks Experience.” A.k.a. vandalizing coffee culture and degrading baristas to chain-producer corporate slaves who are totally alienated from the caffeine-rich “output.”
After a historical drop in domestic Starbucks consumption, the marketing department finally realized that it might be a good idea to turn “back to back” as cozy coffee shops across the street are enjoying loyal customer support and steady demand with offering a set of, say, five coffee options instead of 150.
The fascinating thing about this phenomenon is the long circle the company made. It started with coffee it became an entirely different story with sugar-free cinnamon dolce syrups, smelly morning sandwiches and pre-packed chicken curry salads (what does THAT has to do with an espresso?) but now it is heading back to the original "coffee thing" again.
It's been a long way, indeed. It opened its first stores with the vision that one day its brand name will be the synonym of coffee. In many ways, and for many it is today indeed. To have a “Starbucks break” (i.e. coffee break) and to “grab a Starbucks” (i.e. have a coffee) have become an inherent a part of the American language, the two words being mutually exchangeable. But as we have seen dot com bubbles and housing bubbles burst, Starbucks had better swam than sank before a more painful downturn kicks in.
If this involves turning noisy glocal skim-latte factories into cozier coffee shops with better service, more to-stay options and shifting the focus from the branding process to the brewing process, all the better for the black-water buffs. If not, even the most addicted ones will learn how to make two inch high milk foam and a perfect espresso at home.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Fine American Gastronomy

If I say “American cuisine”, most Europeans endowed with rich gastronomical culture would cynically giggle and think of nasty sodium-filled hamburgers, occasionally de-Frenchised, but “all-American” fries, on-the-go hot dogs, cholesterol ridden barbecue ribs and thousand-calorie triple chocolate cookies. Today, even the mere term “American cuisine” sounds a little too elegant in view of the culinary clichés associated with the US, suggesting that microwave-ready junk meals and fast food belongs to the gastronomical premier league.
But strikingly enough, most Americans I talked to about US cooking culture were swollen with pride about their amazingly tasty “authentic” meals like a good Tex-Mex or cheese steak. I overheard American remarks in the finest restaurants in Paris how much they are longing for a good bucket of Buffalo Wings. I snobbishly rolled my eyes thinking they know nothing about good food, these people. Then traveling around this vast country I came to two basic realizations.
Number one: the maxim is indeed true that “what is food to one, is to others bitter poison.” Some fall for steaks and some fall for snails. Both can be ill-prepared and well-prepared. I happen not to go nuts for steaks, BBQs, fries, casseroles, doughnuts, corn flakes and fudge. But millions here do and maybe it’s just a matter of conditioning your taste buds and tummy to more hearty dishes.
Number two: Americans do have their own heritage of quality cuisine it just happened to be systematically shattered by the golden-arched junk food culture that is both cheaper and more time efficient.
Today, 96 per cent of kids recognize Ronald McDonald (only Santa tops him) and the world famous “golden” M is more widely recognized in this most religious Western country than the Christian cross (see Eric Schlosser’s Fast Food Nation on other shocking culinary observations).
It has not always been like this.
Before Big Mac conquered the hearts of Joe, before Happy Meal started to mean nuggets and cheap toys, before women entered the labor market to generate more disposable income… American moms had and took time to cook and they cooked a variety of tasty meals. Back in the 1940s when GM was associated with automotives and not jumbo size yellow tomatoes of questionable origin, less than one fourth of American’s food dollars went to meals-away-from-home. Nowadays almost half of the average American household’s food spending contributes to the thriving of fast food chains, restaurants, delis, etc.
Waist-sizes doubling, diabetes booming and the nationwide obesity epidemic are its domestic implications. But as internationally the gastro-flagships of America became KFC, Pizza Hut and MacDo, the image of US cuisine around the world degraded to the lowest quality of consumable foodstuff that one can imagine. No wonder most people think that “American” and “cuisine” is an embellishment, oxymoron or a bad joke.
Too bad, because there’s some good stuff that tastes great over here that’s as American as apple pie.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

East Side Story

One of the many things I loved about my CFR internship was its East Side location. Every Thursday morning when I stepped out from Bard Hall on West 58th Street I felt a hint of energy boost. It’s 20 minute walk across Midtown, along the Southern end of the Park, then up north on Fifth Avenue reaching my final destination twenty blocks and a world away from my home in Midtown West.
Once you reach the East Side, things get both prudently humane and callously classy. Streets get wider, buildings get lower and people’s walking pace slows down a little…only a little, of course. Full-time moms who all look like Vogue models right off the covert of the magazine coolly walk their cat-size dogs and take their wellington booted GAP kids to nationally ranked Interschools down the street.
West Side Chinese, Thai and Mexican takeaways are replaced by cozy French patisseries, Italian specialty stores, hundred-bucks-a-bouquet flower shops and a plethora of nail and spa salons.
Time is money but apparently people (or at least people’s wives) have sufficient reserves of both of them on the Upper East. So you would think that once you can afford to live on the East Side, you’d know that you made it.
Actually, it’s not the case or at least less and less so. They say that the East Side moves more and more East across the river, and up the hill, all the way to Brooklyn Heights. A visit to the neighborhoody Park Slope and Prospect Park will suffice to understand why.
Life’s less exquisite in the usual “Manhattan way” but the quality of everydays is more alluring. Those who are ready to give up the row of chic boutiques, celebrity neighbors and absurdly pricy restaurants get taxi-honkless nights and days, relatively tourist-free environment, blue sky, green parks and fresh air. As Brooklyn Heights is rezoning, refurbished and reborn, an increasing number of Manhattanites with or without kids are set to make the trade-off. An average median price of $400-$500 per square foot sounds much better than the Upper East Side’s $1,100. Inevitably, the affluent’s migration, however, is gradually pushing up property prices over the river and might potentially spoil the distinctive ambiance of Brooklyn’s most adorable quarters. But that will be the problem of the next generation of the privileged.

Monday, January 7, 2008

Le Monde de Manhattan

As much as they hate Americans, “Ze French” are omnipresent in this city. Even with Manhattan being one of the most un-French places of America. First of all, people work a lot here. Second, they don’t take time to eat. Third, they tend to work out on a daily basis. Therefore, once experiencing the real art de vivre in France, I thought New York would definitely not be their place.
Well, I was wrong. It just so happens that French is the third most spoken foreign language here, after Spanish and Chinese. (Provided, of course, that we still consider Spanish a foreign language in this country.) They come in massive floods, more than three hundred thousand a year from L’Hexagone to visit. Many of them decide to stay for good and join the exclusive community of bienhereux French expat metropolitans.
What I adore about French expats, though, is their obstinate reluctance to adopt American habits and their deep commitment to their own culture. It’s both entertaining and enviable.
You occasionally meet one or two in the gym but they are the laziest ones in class. (…the French don’t work out.) You see them in line in Whole Foods, but what do they buy? Roquefort and French imported wine. (…the French don’t eat American crap) They pack the halls of museums, but they faithfully stick to Cezanne, Monet, Renoir and Co. (…the French have an adequate amount of of world class painters, why would they care about American artists?)
They’re also there in the best cafes that serve coffee in real mugs and they pack the most excellent dance performances of the Joyce Theater. They’re also all out in Central Park when the weather is idyllically pleasant, oh no, not jogging of course: simply enjoying the intense unseasonal sunshine.
Wherever they go, they tend to flock together and speak French, which is the only reason you can tell there are so many of them. French language, one that everyone must speak even in New York is the indistinguishable symbol of their national pride. For them it is perfectly natural to start and end a conversation without even trying to switch over to the local language. The mere fact that you are able to reply, give directions, chit chat or joke in their native tongue in a city that is not even on their continent hardly ever impresses them. Not that I mind practicing but a little back-patting never hurts. Even so, French two-sentence-conversations became such an ordinary part of my days that sometimes I honestly forget what the official language of this country is. Then I quickly realize that in fact, there isn’t one.

Friday, January 4, 2008

Day of Crude Reckoning

Taking a yearend look at crazily bouncing crude oil prices of the passing months, “Drive less, walk more, change to hybrid” probably would win the 2007 New Year resolution Contest. Econ headlines this fall sounded like a broken record, one from America’s not-so-favorite selection, with a tuneful “$100-a-bar-rel” being the all-repetitive hit verse.
I remember several days at CNN, anxiously anticipating that crude will hit the magic two zero number in just any moment, and then of course it always failed to. So we had to end the day with just another semi-boring market wrap up perversely highlighting the non-event of “we were almost there today.” I honestly felt the nerve racking excitement (one that only sick business people and even sicker business media people feel) those days that I too will be there, in the middle of everything when history is made.
Irony of fate: history was made once I was finally out of there. In fact, being the furthest down South in the Sunny State, I can’t possibly be more out of there now. Irony of irony: Wall Street did not crash, Bush is tranquil in his Oval-o and Americans still drive around their comfy SUVs. (I swear they do, I saw tons them on the highway driving back from Orlando today.)
So the world did not stop revolving around itself. Well, at least not yet. The hardcore trickledown effect is still ahead, as the unusually icy January that freezes scrumptious Florida strawberry fields and scares away even the most devout Disney fanatics has only just begun.
Think tanks and market analysts up in the less sunny capital have long warned that it’s just a matter of time until we see a three digit number on flashy stock billboards that bulls have also been hypnotizing 24/7 for so months. But as soon as the clear and present danger was over and people wiped the sweat of oily stress off their foreheads, they quickly forgot about ugly-bugly market numbers and switched up gears with the usual sense of all-American “I-can-still-afford-it” comfort.
When the closing bell rang yesterday, crude oil finished slightly under $100 again, in the psychologically safe zone of the nineties. So, probably few Americans will suffer from neurotic nightmares of flying hundred-dollar bills, SUV-less Wal-Mart bus trips with sadistically laughing Saudi princes.
Alas, we’re not as far from these wakeful nights as many would wish. So, those who traded weight-loss promises to greener gas pledges on New Year’s Eve, will definitely have more sleep this winter.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Reasons to love (hate) New York

Reading the year-end double issue of the New York magazine was a frightening insight to why people chose to live in one of the world’s most expensive city that has dirtier streets, crappier subway, poorer public service, and more polluted air than all of the European cities I’ve ever been to.
In their third annual “Reasons to love NY” issue, editors of the magazine came up with fifty things that reveal more about the local culture of Manhattan than any anthropological study could possibly come up with.
I have my own reasons to love and hate this city and since I haven’t decided yet which group outweighs the other, I was ready to be convinced that this is the world’s best place in fact. So what’s here to love asked the magazine its readers? NY fanatics dutifully emailed their odes to Manhattan.
Here’s a short panorama of the survey: they love NY because they can dress however they want and no one frowns upon them, they can date five people at once and never get caught, their household garbage can end up in a Chelsea gallery anytime, they can order up pizza from the Italian restaurant right across the street, or get their laundry delivered, they can get a pack of Camel Lights at 3 am in the morning in walking distance, they can hook up with someone on the day of a breakup, they live in the only city that has a nostalgia for crime and last but not least because people in NY wipe their hands with antibacterial after traveling one stop with the train but not after picking up after their pets on the street.
These and a bunch of other vital things are why they love this unique city.
Honestly, I couldn’t give a better summary of why I hate it.

Friday, December 28, 2007

MoMa Milieu

Contemporary art is a perfect reflection of the amoral times we live in today. If you want to know where we’re headed, pay a visit to the MoMA. Look around, breathe in the fragrance of the 21st century and capture the essence of our modern age – and if you come out without being unreservedly depressed you should consider becoming an artist TODAY. These days, you can apparently create literally whatever and not even bother giving it a title (why the effort?). All you have to do is to put a price tag on it and in New York, it would most probably sell.
I used to feel “left out” and simply stupid wandering around in contemporary art exhibitions. I always felt I’m probably just too conservative to understand “art” and there is a good reason for, say, a totally blank white canvas or a 6 square feet large pink, glossy floorboard to be exhibited in the most reputable museums of the world.
But as I’ve spent more and more time studying art history, visiting and re-revisiting the best modern art museums in Paris, DC and New York, I grew more comfortable with modern art. I have a certain taste, preference for artists and periods, and can tell the difference between seemingly identical works of Picasso and Georges Braque.

I think I’ve seen and learned enough by now to boldly say: most of the contemporary exhibits that today occupy entire floors of New York’s most reputable modern art museums should not be on public display.
What is happening nowadays with mainstream contemporary art is, for me, a disaster. Not that there aren’t many contemporary artists who I acknowledge and appreciate. There are quite a few. But the tragedy is that they never make it to the elitist “mainstream” club and will never be seen by millions of visitors each year in the Upper East Side of Manhattan. I wish I knew who ultimately decides that two dozen oversized paintings of faceless nurses bleeding here and there in the most obscure body positions and color combinations must definitely be seen by thousands of people from around the world every day. I would love to introduce them to my eight year old sister who kept asking me all the time: “Anna, what about this is art?”
I wish I knew what to tell her.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

"Merry Whatever"

Just when I realized how politically incorrect I have been in the last two weeks sending out my verbal and virtual "Merry Christmas" wishes I saw this sign on the street in a shop window on Times Square:
"Merry Whatever - Happy 2008."
Despite the fact that I come from a city that has one of the highest Jewish population and has been historically considered to be the most religiously tolerant one in the region, P.C. language has not yet encroached upon our Holidays in Hungary. Thank God! (...or any deity you believe in.)
But of course, when it comes to multiculturalism and diversity of religious affiliation, Budapest and Manhattan can hardly compete with each other. So considering the practical and profit oriented WASP business culture of this country it does make some sense to simply refer to “Holidays.”
But notwithstanding the numeric minority of Christians in New York City, I staunchly oppose “Merry Whatever”. Whatever can’t be "merry". Being PC is one thing and staleness is another especially in the case of quasi-popularist euphemism treadmills aimed at the most sacred day of the year.
I am afraid, MTV’s Broadway sign was the latter one, a linguistic first degree assault on Christmas. On a holiday, that way too many people spend in solitude or in multiplex cinemas in this city.
So, as for myself, I stubbornly refused to be trendy this year and stuck to “Merry Christmas” even to all my Muslim, Jewish, and non-Christian friends. None of them were offended and they all seemed to be happy with the old fashioned terminology.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

CNN Moms

Growing up on CNN I was always trying to imagine how these perfect looking anchors with flawless
make up and hairdo can look like when they wake up at 5 am before dawn and instead of smiling “Good Morning America!” into the camera yawn a prolonged ‘mooorning to their dearly loved husband. My first day at CNN gave me an unforgettable revelation and answer to my immature ponderings: guess what, they look like any “man on the street” (or MOS, by media jargon).
Ok, maybe from the aesthetically more gifted clan.
When I first met the anchor who was sitting right across me for the last 4 months, I uttered a relieved sigh seeing she was indeed human. Then my eyes rolled down to undergo another shocking discovery. Not only was she human: she was pregnant. Reeeally pregnant. I guess you can’t be more human than that but that’s something you can never tell from your couch watching her updates on Wall Street trade indexes or the latest merger of the month.
Amazing how professional pregnant moms can sound on air and how naturally they can switch over to random baby care topics ranging from the daily record number of diapers to babysitter drama. The more I walked around in our trillion-dollar building the more I felt that literally every second woman seemed to have an unusually large and suspiciously round belly. And no, this time it actually didn’t have anything to do with world famous American obesity. CNN moms simply flooded Time Warner Center this year. This made me wonder whether I missed some sweeping libido booster cupid-tsunami this year or Time Warner just simply pays CNN moms a decent enough paycheck for maternity leave. Well, it turns out that the second guess was as far from the truth as one can get. Namely because in the US moms get (read my lips) “ze-ro” paid days when they pay their duties to society and give birth to a new proud member of the American citizenry. The US and Australia happen to be the only industrialized countries in the world that don’t recognize that parenting is as tough a job as any respectable work on the labor market. While in most EU countries it is a mother’s codified right to have an average of 3 months of maternity leave, most US companies fail to provide any financial assistance for the new moms. When Maggie left us a week ago, although she gave her professional-as-always anchor-self, her tummy-size was alarming and we couldn’t stop wondering when the baby eventually would plop out. On her leave I asked when she would be back and she said she’ll be back February. I gave a puzzled look and thought of my mom who being a decent European social welfare mom took out a seven year leave when me, my brother and my sister arrived one after the other. But that’s Europe, where governments don’t just preach family values but use tax revenues to defend them. Here, being at home for more than a couple of weeks is a huge financial sacrifice and by the way: they’re the epithet of women labor inefficiency.
The phenomenon might not seem so perplexing and hyper-feminist if we consider Workaholism and
Productivity as America’s true secular religion but if I were an American, I’d rather satisfy myself
with a slightly smaller chunk of the world’s GDP and raise my children in peace, at home.

Sunday, December 9, 2007

I feel it in my fingers...

When I moved here, I knew I was going to live in a different time zone, but no one warned me that living on “American time” will also mean that the week will start with Sunday instead of Monday; daylight saving time will come a week later than it is supposed to; that mid-November-Thanksgiving starts around Halloween, in late October, and Santa starts knocking on doors before most Americans recover from their ten course Turkey-day dinners. I am seriously afraid, that on Christmas Eve people will be celebrating New Year’s Eve...
I have the feeling that I jumped not only a time zone but a month zone too. I usually feel that Christmas comes a little earlier each and every year as it is supposed to. But here, it came brutally early. I started to hear Christmas carols and see red-white-and-green decorations a month and a half before the Big Day which eventually coincided with Halloween, creating a slight holiday décor traffic jam of Superman costumes, Thanksgiving pumpkin pies and red nosed reindeers.
At first I was distressed as most of us, gift sprinters, who do Christmas shopping on the day before and spend the entire pre-holiday week under the familiar mid-December chronic stress. Why on earth can’t they leave me alone in early November with hip-swinging Santas, and glossy Happy Hanuka postcards? Naively I thought it was my inalienable right to maintain my bad habit of last minute present-hunt.
Well, not in this country. Especially not in this city. And particularly not in my case, working in the same building with the fanciest shopping mall in NY. Time Warner Center (TWC) has its pros and cons. Normally, lots of pros and few cons. Well, in December, the cons seem to triumph as TWC happens to be the second most favorite destination of my beloved British shopping tourists. I have been under constant attack of all the tacky holiday décor-wonders the most expensive shopping mall in NY has to offer for more than a month now.
At first the Nutcracker offensive seasoned with jolly jingle bells assaults made me want to organize my own little “Remember? Santa’s coming to town in DE-CEM-BER!” protest movement…then as time flew by and I learned all the Christmas songs by heart, bought couple of presents 3 weeks earlier than I was used to, (partially alleviating the severe pre-12/24 symptoms, by the way) I realized, how much I was enjoying the abundance of colorful lights, flashy shop windows and holiday edition gingerbread lattes.
Obviously, now that the streetlights go on almost midday and my winter coat becomes my second skin it all makes much more sense than a month ago. And I can’t say it bothers me that I could smell those wonderful pine trees piled up neatly on the street on my way back home either. Extending the best 2-day Holiday of the year into a 2-month event is not a bad thing, really. After all, it’s about that dusty, old 4 letter word, that so many people seem to have forgotten about here. Love, actually. So if you can enjoy all the fun stuff it comes with its Big Day for a little longer, why not?